kernel/process: Use accessors instead of class members for referencing segment array

Using member variables for referencing the segments array increases the
size of the class in memory for little benefit. The same behavior can be
achieved through the use of accessors that just return the relevant
segment.

1 files changed, 32 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/src/core/hle/kernel/process.h b/src/core/hle/kernel/process.h
index 98d8da35e..f29ee67c6 100644
--- a/src/core/hle/kernel/process.h
+++ b/src/core/hle/kernel/process.h
@@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ enum class ProcessStatus { Created, Running, Exited };
 class ResourceLimit;
 
 struct CodeSet final : public Object {
+    struct Segment {
+        size_t offset = 0;
+        VAddr addr = 0;
+        u32 size = 0;
+    };
+
     static SharedPtr<CodeSet> Create(std::string name);
 
     std::string GetTypeName() const override {
@@ -69,24 +75,38 @@ struct CodeSet final : public Object {
         return HANDLE_TYPE;
     }
 
-    /// Name of the process
-    std::string name;
+    Segment& CodeSegment() {
+        return segments[0];
+    }
 
-    std::shared_ptr<std::vector<u8>> memory;
+    const Segment& CodeSegment() const {
+        return segments[0];
+    }
 
-    struct Segment {
-        size_t offset = 0;
-        VAddr addr = 0;
-        u32 size = 0;
-    };
+    Segment& RODataSegment() {
+        return segments[1];
+    }
 
-    Segment segments[3];
-    Segment& code = segments[0];
-    Segment& rodata = segments[1];
-    Segment& data = segments[2];
+    const Segment& RODataSegment() const {
+        return segments[1];
+    }
+
+    Segment& DataSegment() {
+        return segments[2];
+    }
+
+    const Segment& DataSegment() const {
+        return segments[2];
+    }
+
+    std::shared_ptr<std::vector<u8>> memory;
 
+    Segment segments[3];
     VAddr entrypoint;
 
+    /// Name of the process
+    std::string name;
+
 private:
     CodeSet();
     ~CodeSet() override;